Great Porter Square: A Mystery. v. 1 — Text and Context
Edition facts
The catalog record for Great Porter Square: A Mystery. v. 1 — Text and Context provides practical reading context through 49,445 words, 3 hr 35 min estimated reading time, and 6 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 15.7 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
INTRODUCES MRS. JAMES PREEDY; HINTS AT THE TROUBLE INTO WHICH SHE HAS FALLEN; AND GIVES AN INSIGHT INTO HER SOCIAL POSITION.
Mrs. James Preedy, lodging-house keeper, bred and born in the vocation, and consequently familiar with all the moves of that extensive class of persons in London that has no regular home, and has to be cooked for, washed for, and generally done for, sat in the kitchen of her house, No. 118, Great Porter Square. This apartment was situated in the basement, and here Mrs. Preedy received her friends and "did" for her lodgers, in so far as the cooking for them can be said to be included in that portentous and significant term. The floor of the kitchen was oil-clothed, with, in distinguished places, strips of carpet of various patterns and colours, to give it an air. Over the mantelpiece was a square looking-glass in a mahogany frame, ranged on each side of which were faded photographs of men, women, and children, and of one gentleman in particular pretending to smoke a long pipe. This individual, whose face was square, whose aspect was frowning, and whose shirt sleeves were tucked up in an exceedingly free and easy fashion, was the pictorial embodiment of Mrs. Preedy's deceased husband. While he lived he was "a worryer, my dear," to quote Mrs. Preedy--and to do the lady justice, he looked it; but being gone to that bourne from which no lodging-house keeper ever returns, he immediately took his place in the affections of his widow as "the dear departed" and a "blessed angel." Thus do we often find tender appreciation budding into flower even at the moment the undertaker nails the lid upon the coffin, and Mr. Preedy, when the breath was out of his body, might (spiritually) have consoled himself with the reflection that he was not the only person from whose grave hitherto unknown or unrecognised virtues ascend. The weapons of the dead warrior, two long and two short pipes, were ranged crosswise on the wall with mathematical tenderness. When her day's work was over, and Mrs. Preedy, a lonely widow, sat by herself in the kitchen, she was wont to look regretfully at those pipes, wishing that he who had smoked them were alive to puff again as of yore; forgetting, in the charity of her heart, the crosses and vexations of her married life, and how often she had called her "blessed angel" a something I decline to mention for defiling the kitchen with his filthy smoke.
The other faded photographs of men, women, and children, represented three generations of Mrs. Preedy's relations. They were not a handsome family; family portraits, as a rule, when the sun is the painter, are not remarkable for beauty, but these were a worse lot than usual. In their painful anxiety to exhibit themselves in a favourable light, Mrs. Preedy's relations had leered and stared to such a degree that it must have been no easy matter for them to get their features back into their natural shape after the photographer in the City Road was done with them. To make things worse, they were in their Sunday clothes, and if they had just been going into the penitentiary they could not have looked more unhappy and uncomfortable.
On the mantelpiece, also, were two odd broken lustres which, in the course of their chequered career, had lost half their crystal drops; two fat vases, with a neat device of cabbage roses painted on them; an erratic clock, whose vagaries supplied a healthy irritant to its mistress; and a weather indicator, in the shape of an architectural structure representing two rural bowers, in one of which, suspended on catgut, dwelt an old wooden farmer, and in the other, also suspended on catgut, a young wooden woman. When the weather was going to be stormy, the wooden old farmer swung out, and with an assumption of preternatural wisdom stared vacantly before him; when it was going to be fine, the wooden young woman made her appearance, with a smirk and a leer indicative of weak brains. They never appeared together; when one was in the other was out; and that they were more frequently wrong than right in their vaticinations concerning the weather (being out when they ought to have been in, and in when they ought to have been out: which, in an odd way, has a political signification) did not in the slightest degree affect the wooden impostors. In this respect they were no worse than other impostors, not made of wood, who set themselves up as prophets (announcing, for instance, from time to time, the end of the world), and exhibit no sense of shame at the continual confounding of their predictions.
The mystery of Great Porter Square unfolds not through a single detective but through a chorus of voices: newspaper columns, a landlady's troubled dreams, and a servant's candid letters. Volume 1 of B. L. Farjeon's 1885 novel opens with Mrs. James Preedy, a lodging-house keeper, whose kitchen becomes a stage for both domestic routine and the looming crime next door. The narrative quickly fractures, handing over large stretches to the Evening Moon newspaper, which reports on the murder and its aftermath with a mix of factual detail and moral outrage. This polyphonic approach creates a sense of a community obsessed with the case, each account colored by its source's biases and limitations.
Newspaper as Narrator
The Evening Moon is not merely quoted; it becomes a character. Farjeon devotes entire chapters to its reports, editorials, and a special correspondent's investigations. The paper's voice shifts from dry reportage—detailing the sum of £68 17s. collected for the suspect Antony Cowlrick—to theatrical condemnation: "Tremble, thou unspeakable monster!" This stylistic range suggests the newspaper's dual role as informant and moral arbiter. The excerpts also reveal a self-awareness in the paper's commentary, as it speculates that the murderer may read its own words that very night. By embedding the mystery within journalistic discourse, Farjeon invites readers to question the reliability of public narratives and the sensationalism that can distort a case.
Dream Logic and Domestic Unease
Chapter XII shifts abruptly from the newspaper's public voice to Mrs. Preedy's private, unconscious mind. Her dreams are grotesque and psychologically revealing: she imagines her dead husband alive and guilty, and she enjoys the prospect of his hanging. A wooden figure from a weather indicator becomes a Lilliputian murderer, creeping through a hole in the wall to commit the crime. These surreal images contrast sharply with the factual tone of the newspaper extracts. The dream sequences serve as a counterpoint, suggesting that the domestic sphere is as haunted by the murder as the public one. Mrs. Preedy's earlier remark—"I shall never rest easy in my mind till the man's caught and hung!"—is ironically fulfilled in her sleep, where rest is impossible and guilt is displaced onto absurd figures.
Servant's Letters and Layered Perspectives
Later chapters introduce Becky, a servant who writes letters to a friend in the country. Her epistolary voice offers a different register: personal, gossipy, and grounded in daily life. She describes how she obtained her situation at No. 118 and her impressions of Mrs. Preedy's young man lodger. Becky's letters provide a window into the household's social dynamics, filtering the mystery through the eyes of someone who is both insider and outsider. Her stated reason for not liking Richard Manx—"a woman's reason"—hints at unspoken tensions. This shift in narrative mode, from newspaper rhetoric to dream symbolism to intimate correspondence, creates a layered investigation where truth is refracted through class, gender, and personal bias. The reader must piece together the crime from these competing accounts, none of which claims full authority.
Volume 1 of Great Porter Square resists a straightforward telling. Farjeon's use of multiple narrators—the newspaper, the landlady's dreams, the servant's letters—means that the mystery is never presented directly but always mediated. Readers should attend to who is speaking and why, as each voice carries its own agenda and blind spots. The novel rewards those who enjoy assembling a puzzle from fragments, trusting neither the sensational press nor the troubled subconscious, but weighing both against the mundane observations of a servant girl.
There’s something tender about Farjeon’s layered voices—each one trusting its own version of the truth. It made me think of those quiet, mistaken nights we all carry. I found a similar ache in Secret Service Being the Happenings of a Night in Richmond in the Spring of 1865 — Story, Setting & Ideas, where one evening holds more than anyone can say. Both feel like old rooms, full of echoes.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Your personal reading reflection
Build a private reading journal entry for this title.